Your organization, American Cancer Society’s Cancer Action Network, opposes SF 607 in its current form, correct? We’re thankful Senate President Schneider has come out with an effort to address the issue, because e-cigarettes are clearly a problem. We’ve seen a 78 percent increase in use by teens across the nation in the past year alone. In Iowa, 23 percent of 11th graders report using e-cigarettes in the last 30 days — a huge increase. Having said that, we know traditional tobacco use is still a huge problem, and it remains the leading cause of preventable death. But we are currently registered against the bill because it is not evidence-based, so what we’re asking is to have a seat at the table in order make some key changes and improve the bill’s effectiveness. Describe the changes you’d like to see implemented in the bill. Our top ask is changing the way we define ‘cigarettes.’ Right now, vapor products and electronic nicotine delivery devices are defined separately from tobacco products, meaning they’re not regulated the same way, they’re not included in smoke-free laws, and they’re not even taxed beyond the normal sales tax. We want these newer products to be included in the broader definition so that the government can regulate them the same way. The second change is the youth penalty piece — we argue the state should penalize retailers, not youth. Also, there’s a military exemption. But given that we know the harms of tobacco use, no one should be exempt. What’s the thinking behind the proposed exemption for veterans and military members? The argument we hear a lot is if you’re old enough to fight and die for your country, you’re old enough to choose whether or not to use tobacco products. Our counter: We don’t make that argument for alcohol, so why would we make it for tobacco? I also recently heard a good argument from [state] Senator Quirmbach at the bill subcommittee hearing. He argued it’s a constitutional right to vote; it’s not a constitutional right to smoke cigarettes. But ultimately it comes down to this — when anybody, including military members, get sick from tobacco use, we all as taxpayers take on that expense. Why is advocating for tobacco-free living so important for children and families in Iowa? Like I mentioned, tobacco remains the leading cause of preventable death. I think we as a culture in Iowa have lost sight of that due to the smoke-free laws passed in 2008. Certainly, we’ve seen a reduction in the visibility of smoking — which is great. But tobacco use remains a prevalent problem that we have to continue addressing. Kids using tobacco and getting addicted to nicotine today are the same kids who are going to lead our county 10, 15, 20 years from now. They’re going to be engineers, doctors and teachers. The way we respond today to tobacco use by our young people—and whether or not we keep them healthy — impacts the health and well-being of our state long term. |